Dapsone Rx

Topical gel vs oral tablets: the route divide

Every row cites its source. Where a cell reflects our own reading of the evidence rather than an external source, the row says so.

The same molecule at two exposures two orders of magnitude apart. Every row cites its source; this is the table the rest of the site keeps pointing back to.

Topical gel vs oral tablets: the route divide
AspectTopical gel (5% / 7.5%)Oral tablets (25 / 100 mg)Source
Approved useAcne vulgaris (7.5%: ages 9 and up)Dermatitis herpetiformis; all non-resistant leprosysource
Systemic exposureAUC 282 to 415 ng.h/mL; about 1% of a 100 mg oral dose52,641 ng.h/mL from a single 100 mg dose; chronic troughs around 2,300 ng/mLsource
HemolysisTransient lab changes in the G6PD crossover trial; no clinical anemia; largest hemoglobin drop was in the vehicle groupDose-related and near-universal: 1 to 2 g hemoglobin loss in almost all patientssource
MethemoglobinemiaPostmarketing case reports, including pediatric exposures; labels teach cyanosis recognitionThe most common drug cause in hospital series: 42% of 138 cases, mean peak 7.6%source
Agranulocytosis and hypersensitivityNot observed in topical trials (oral experience carried on the label as class information)Deaths reported; about 1 per 3,000 patient-years agranulocytosis; DHS in 1.4% with 9.9% fatalitysource
Required monitoringNone in the current labelsCBC weekly for month 1, monthly for 6 months, then semi-annually; liver function when feasiblesource
G6PD deficiencyNo testing required (2005 label required it; deleted in 2008 after the crossover trial)Caution: exaggerated dose-related hemolysis; treat anemia first, monitor hemoglobinsource
ContraindicationsNone listedHypersensitivity to dapsone or derivativessource
Pregnancy and lactationNo human data; low absorption is the label's stated basisCategory C; excreted in breast milk in substantial amounts; neonatal hemolytic reactions possiblesource
Start provider review